0 Replies Latest reply on May 28, 2014 2:50 PM by aruntechie123

    Heartbleed : Is 16542 redundant if 16505 is active?


      Hello All,


      We have been provided a report of Heartbleed affected servers and observed that each server is listed twice with the following 2 entries


      Entry 1 : Vul ID : 16505 -

          - the Heartbleed bug




      Entry 2 : Vul ID : 16542 -

          (HPSBMU02998) HP System Management Homepage; Multiple vulnerabilities are present in some versions of HP System Management Homepage.

         CVE-2014-0160 CVE-2013-4353 CVE-2013-6449 CVE-2013-6450



      Please advise if 16542 can be termed as redundant (i.e. treat as duplicate) when 16505 is already active. Thanks.


      (I know no knowledge of McAfee)




      Message was edited by: aruntechie123 on 5/28/14 2:50:05 PM CDT