0 Replies Latest reply on May 28, 2014 2:50 PM by aruntechie123

    Heartbleed : Is 16542 redundant if 16505 is active?

    aruntechie123

      Hello All,

       

      We have been provided a report of Heartbleed affected servers and observed that each server is listed twice with the following 2 entries

       

      Entry 1 : Vul ID : 16505 -

          - the Heartbleed bug

          CVE-2014-0160 

       

       

      Entry 2 : Vul ID : 16542 -

          (HPSBMU02998) HP System Management Homepage; Multiple vulnerabilities are present in some versions of HP System Management Homepage.

         CVE-2014-0160 CVE-2013-4353 CVE-2013-6449 CVE-2013-6450

       

       

      Please advise if 16542 can be termed as redundant (i.e. treat as duplicate) when 16505 is already active. Thanks.

       

      (I know no knowledge of McAfee)

       

      Regards.

       

      Message was edited by: aruntechie123 on 5/28/14 2:50:05 PM CDT