Does anyone help me?
If I am reading your post correctly, it looks like PC1 completed fine, PC2 / 3 timed out (expired) and PC4 did nothing because it wasn't found in ePO. You can always test this by running them individually against the webAPI.
You might try:
Then see how what the outcome is. I would expect that by now PC2 may respond. I'm not certain but I believe it will still take a while for ePO to recognize the new machine that has been added. Especially if you are adding manually and not letting the agent send the props packets.
Try that and let us know.
Thank you for your reply.
I try to access the following URLs and the results are below. Unfortunately the error messages are all Japanese and I tried to change the locale by using option ":locale=en" but I could not. I translate the Japanese messages to English.
Failed to wake up agent
Failed to wake up agent
Could not find the system to wake up. Please input valid computer ID or name.
I feel PC4 case should be returned "Error" and the status should be "failed".
Do you know any other situation to show "fail" status on the wake up agent?
So with PC1 this is the behavior we expect. The command was successful in waking up PC1.
PC2 / PC3 this is also expected behavior. The result that you received it typical. Since the webAPI call could not be completed that is were the "Error 0:" came from.
The 'failed to wake up agent' portion is the actual response given by the command and not Call function being used to access the site.
Now, PC4 is unique. The command completed. It was returned as "OK:" because the actuall call executed properly.
The "Could not find the system to wake up. Please input valid computer ID or name." Is what we would expect if the machine does not exist in ePO.
I know it seems a little backwards for PC4 to error out and yet still return OK. But this is expected behavior.
I was able to replicate your results and I am using Powershell with the .Net System.Net.WebClient functions.
Hopefully that helped to alleviate some of the confusion. If not, I will see if I can explain it better.
I understand the case of PC4, but
tt should be "completed: 2", I think.
And I have no idea of the status "failed" case. I think "tailed" status may be the error code "Error" except time out. Is there any example situation?
Completed will still only show 1 because even though PC4 returns "OK:" it is not actually completing the call.
Since the machine does not exist it cannot complete. It is not a failed call either for the same reason...there is nothing there to fail except the actuall call.
An example of a failed wakeup call would be if the machine exists in ePO more than once... or if more than one machine shares an Agent GUID.
Thank you, I understand.
I will try to do your example situation.