1 Reply Latest reply on Jul 11, 2011 6:11 PM by cgrim

    Differences from 6.8 to 7.0 using CIDR addressing...

      Had a 6.8 environment with scans setup using CIDR addressing for various subnets so that the beginning address is 192.168.1.0 and ending is 192.168.1.255 for a Full vulnerability scan.  After upgrading to MVM 7.0, these same scans now max out firewall connections and resources between the scan engine and systems being scanned. 

       

      If the .0 and .255 addresses are removed from the scans all is same as previous 6.8 environment. 

       

      What is different about the way MVM 7.0 uses this CIDR addressing opposed to v6.8???

       

      Any insight into this would be appreciated.

       

      Thanks.

       

      Sean