public and db_owner were already been granted under Database role however user permission error still occurring and that Server role in question, specifically the db_owner as described in KB, PG, IG on any McAfee documents don't exist in a Server role, and I know most of you will agree that we cannot grant sysadmin and serveradmin role to epo service account most specially in the SQL shared environment.
Curious, are you using windows or sql permission to authenticate?
I have problems with SQL Permissions, too...
In an error log i get:
- java.sql.SQLException: The User 'dbo' hasn't the permissions to execute DBCC freeproccache.
in wich way the installation needs to do that ?
Upgrade from ePo 5.3 to 5.9
Im doing a new install on a test box for 5.9 and I am getting the same issue and it rolls back at the very end with this being the only error I can find.
Installation guide doesnt not specify any further SQL permissions being required except the ones listed.
So what gives???
Was going to log a ticket online and send them the logs, but it appears the portal is currently down for submitting ticket or seeing current status.
Why is it that the installation wizard, cant be more informative on errors except that its rolling back (without going into the log files) or give the explanation of the top 10 issues with KB articles, etc.
Anyone solve this issue without giving sysadmin or possibly the alter server permission?
Support wasn't that helpful...
I've copied the database to my SQL test environment and gave the SQL user sysadmin permissions. So the installation was successful and I've copied the database back to the production server.
That's my solution. Hope that helps
I just used the SQLExpress and installed on the machine itself so I had full control over SQL - its only a test, see what is special about 5.9 - was told better dashboard, etc....so far...meh.
Beats asking the DB guys to log in on the weekend to give me a little extra boost to permissions for short period.
I dont believe this is a new issue either...why does the documentation not reflect the extra permissions is my concern.