Is there any way of modifying the McAfee AutoUpdate task on the client computers from EPO server. In the help it says
From the ePolicy Orchestrator console, go to Systems | System tree | Client Task
. Select an existing update task or to create a new task, click New Task
, then from the Type list, select Update (McAfee Agent) and click Next
Problem is when I select new task there is no Update (McAfee Agent) task. There is a Autoupdate task for groupshield but not for McAfee Agent. There is a product update task but then the clients have 2 update tasks.
I have version 4.5.0 1499 of the McAfee agent and I have installed 184.108.40.206 of McAfee Angent Extensions installed.
Solved! Go to Solution.
I'm afraid not - the only option from within ePO is to disable the default autoupdate task (the assumption being that you've created another update task, thereby leaving you with just one functional task that is under your control.)
Note that this is a one-way operation - once you've disabled the default task you can't re-enable it, but that's not really a problem.)
I'm afraid I don't know
From an ePO point of view, everything is working OK - i.e. when you change the policy to enable the task again, the correct policy element is being changed and sent to the cliet machine. t's just that for some reason that change is not being enforced by the VSE installation on the client machine. I don't know whether that's as designed or not
You may get more luck asking on the Viruscan forum - I've asked my colleagues here who deal with VSE, and they don't know.
The option is described "Disable default autoupdate task schedule". Check it, and the local update task on VSE will be disabled.
Unchecking it does not translate to "Enable default autoupdate task schedule".
Unchecking it translates to "do nothing". It would be a feature change (FMR) to modify the behavior such that the local update task becomes enabled again, in which case we would probably change the text too so it's more intuitive as to what it does.
Revamping the User Interface is sorely needed, in my opinion, as there are other equally ambiguous settings and that behave contrary to what I just explained!
Point being, if a setting needs clarification on its functionality then seek that clarification from Support - jumping to conclusions might lead to disappointment.
UI improvement is meant to be a focus in a future release (possibly 9.0).