I've setup the test environment below:
DC
Hostname: AD
IP: 192.168.x.x
Pri ePO
Hostname: ePOA
IP: 192.168.x.x
Pri DB
Hostname: DBA
IP: 192.168.x.x
Sec ePO
Hostname: ePOB
IP: 1192.168.x.x
Sec DB
Hostname: DBB
IP: 192.168.x.x
AH1
Hostname: AHA
IP: 192.168.x.x
AH2
Hostname: AHB
IP: 192.168.x.x
Test Result:
Before swing
nslookup ePOA
192.168.x.x
nslookup DBA
192.168.x.x
After swing
nslookup ePOA
192.168.x.x
nslookup DBB
192.168.x.x
And ePO works!
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
When epo is clustered, you have to use the virtual cluster name and IP for clients to connect to, not any individual primary or secondary node names/ip's. That way if the cluster fails over to one of the other nodes, the connection is not lost, as the connection is made to the cluster itself that controls which node is active and receiving the traffic.
Was my reply helpful?
If this information was helpful in any way or answered your question, will you please select Accept as Solution in my reply and together we can help other members?
I've set up the sql cluster the same way as I did for ePO and use the virtual sql ip/hostname of the sql cluster for ePO to connect to instead of any individual node.
SQL Cluster Validation:
I try to figure out the issue and found a solution by modifying Pri DB (DBA) IP to Virtual SQL IP.
Did the SQL Cluster Validation steps again. It works like a charm! Thank you! 😄
Probably is best to ask that vendor swing Pri and see how redirect the traffic unless someone else have better knowledge than me with that vendor
Was my reply helpful?
If this information was helpful in any way or answered your question, will you please select Accept as Solution in my reply and together we can help other members?
Additionally, please do not post sensitive info on a public forum such as IP's and host names.
Was my reply helpful?
If this information was helpful in any way or answered your question, will you please select Accept as Solution in my reply and together we can help other members?
Probably yes or the vendor itself
Are you talking about epo and db clustering? What exactly do you mean by "swing"?
Was my reply helpful?
If this information was helpful in any way or answered your question, will you please select Accept as Solution in my reply and together we can help other members?
No. What I really mean was ePO and DNS clustering. The term "swing" is pointing.
Customer want it this way. One main reason was; If customer updated the DNS associate domain names with other forms of information to (Pri ePO), the domain DNS will be served and share records by the other server (Sec ePO) in the cluster. Instead of using Pri ePO. Use Sec ePO.
I need the setup and configuration of the cluster services and application to work.
i think something happen to the message i sent yesterday, maybe i didn't hit "POST" but if you are a Mcafee Professional services then lets take this internally
Corporate Headquarters
6220 America Center Drive
San Jose, CA 95002 USA