cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
rsharris3
Level 7

Differences from 6.8 to 7.0 using CIDR addressing...

Had a 6.8 environment with scans setup using CIDR addressing for various subnets so that the beginning address is 192.168.1.0 and ending is 192.168.1.255 for a Full vulnerability scan.  After upgrading to MVM 7.0, these same scans now max out firewall connections and resources between the scan engine and systems being scanned. 

If the .0 and .255 addresses are removed from the scans all is same as previous 6.8 environment. 

What is different about the way MVM 7.0 uses this CIDR addressing opposed to v6.8???

Any insight into this would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Sean

0 Kudos
1 Reply
cgrim
Level 13

Re: Differences from 6.8 to 7.0 using CIDR addressing...

Hi Sean,

I'm not 100% sure, I need to look into this  - can you open a Service Request, and send me the SR # -> you have my email address :-)

-Cathy

0 Kudos