Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

File and Removable Media Protection, SMB

Regarding this KB:

I have been doing a test implementation of File and Removable Media Protection (tried both 4.3 and 5.0), and have been seeing some extreme performance issues. ~60-90 seconds to open simple text file. The recommendation is apparently to disable opportunistic locking, but from what I've read, this is only possible in SMB1, and cannot be disabled in SMB2 or 3.

I have tested disabling SMB 3 (Server 2012 R2 server) completely and forcing SMB1, and indeed this has cured my performance issues. However I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with this solution going forward. Seems a little ridiculous that this product would be reliant on Windows XP-era technology. Just wondering if this is common, the recommended configuration, or maybe there's something else I'm missing that might explain the issue?

You Deserve an Award
Don't forget, when your helpful posts earn a kudos or get accepted as a solution you can unlock perks and badges. Those aren't the only badges, either. How many can you collect? Click here to learn more.

Community Help Hub

    New to the forums or need help finding your way around the forums? There's a whole hub of community resources to help you.

  • Find Forum FAQs
  • Learn How to Earn Badges
  • Ask for Help
Go to Community Help

Join the Community

    Thousands of customers use the McAfee Community for peer-to-peer and expert product support. Enjoy these benefits with a free membership:

  • Get helpful solutions from McAfee experts.
  • Stay connected to product conversations that matter to you.
  • Participate in product groups led by McAfee employees.
Join the Community
Join the Community